Politics, Logic, Nerds, and Basic Common Sense

RSS
Sep 1

stay-in-reality-liberals:

stay-in-reality-liberals:

Should I make some puns for posts?

Or are they a crime here?

Do it. I love me some puns

Sep 1

My new thing is to correct people when they use the word “literal” wrong in sentences. I mean damn, it isn’t that hard to understand its use.

Sep 1

genderbitch:

what the fuck did i just read

(Source: cutbu)

Sep 1

heritage-and-tradition:

whytestallion:

stay-in-reality-liberals:

durkin62:

logicd:

Ok so tl;dr

  • some guy hacks icloud and gets tons of nude pics and vids of celebrities
  • posts it on anonymous image board 4chan
  • it spreads to imgur and reddit etc
  • feminists and sjw’s go crazy about rape culture and privacy rights and shit
  • meanwhile “lol whats the NSA and who is Snowden?”
  • anyway 4chan decides yet again to fuck with these retards with fake twitter hashtags because they were very successful in the past
  • convince women to post nude pics of themselves to twitter to stand in “solidarity” with Jennifer Lawrence and others who had their pics leaked
  • it works and women post pics of their tits and shit while people on 4chan laugh their asses off

Bravo

So they were upset over someones nudes being plastered over the internet, so they plastered their own nudes over the internet. I guess if you make a left turn a couple thousand times it’ll eventually take you right. 

Funny stuff. It’s like watching a dog chase it’s own tail.

Someone on Facebook posted that EXACT article and I nearly went ape shit. I thought twice since Facebook fights end up with a massive split sides. But I drew up a long response:


First, you have pornography. Now there are, of course, private sex tapes that are “leaked” by people. My question to anyone who agrees: why do we not seek out these people? Whether it be man or woman, the idea is it is a violation. But nobody does a thing about it at all. Well, let’s step back. What about doxxing? The flagrant and open posting of someone’s address/email/telephone or other information. Is that considered assault? Absolutely not. Assault requires a lot more than taking or sharing information. While still wrong, putting it on the same level of assault is an insult to those who go through true harm. Which brings my second point.

Second, who gets off on saying naked pictures are assault? That is absolutely wrong and I’ll use a link to help prove my point:
http://www.plea.org/legal_resources/?a=127&searchTxt=&cat=8&pcat=

And

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/assault-battery-aggravated-assault-33775.html

The first describes what assault is while the second describes a scenario. The scenario is one where you’re afraid and justified, but there is no clear and present danger. Then there is a scenario where there is clear danger. Of course it is over simplified, but this does not constitute any of what the writer is saying. It is embarrassing, it is a breach of privacy, and the perpetrators should be caught, but this is NOT assault.

Least I have a use for it now! Anyway, idiots like this is why lawyers are absolutely necessary. You can’t argue that this is assault.

The fact that there were women dumb enough to post naked pictures of themselves “in support of” Jennifer Lawrence is either hilarious or pathetic, I’m not sure which. The reason you shouldn’t look for the pictures isn’t because it’s “psychic violence”, it’s because you’re looking at something she meant to keep private between her and (I’m assuming) her boyfriend, and it’s just the wrong thing to do.

I don’t think Jennifer wants Feminists using her for their agenda, she probably just wants the pictures removed (as much as they can be) and the person that stole them prosecuted.

I agree. I won’t look them up and hope the perp gets caught. However when I read an article, I scan for accurate information. That article was absolute opinion and pure BS. It basically says that taking the photos from the cloud constitutes assault, and anyone looking at them partakes in assault and should be punished as such. I lost all respect for the chick who posted it on Facebook. It’s a shame how many people believe what this article says.

Sep 1

stay-in-reality-liberals:

durkin62:

logicd:

Ok so tl;dr

  • some guy hacks icloud and gets tons of nude pics and vids of celebrities
  • posts it on anonymous image board 4chan
  • it spreads to imgur and reddit etc
  • feminists and sjw’s go crazy about rape culture and privacy rights and shit
  • meanwhile “lol whats the NSA and who is Snowden?”
  • anyway 4chan decides yet again to fuck with these retards with fake twitter hashtags because they were very successful in the past
  • convince women to post nude pics of themselves to twitter to stand in “solidarity” with Jennifer Lawrence and others who had their pics leaked
  • it works and women post pics of their tits and shit while people on 4chan laugh their asses off

Bravo

So they were upset over someones nudes being plastered over the internet, so they plastered their own nudes over the internet. I guess if you make a left turn a couple thousand times it’ll eventually take you right. 

Funny stuff. It’s like watching a dog chase it’s own tail.

Someone on Facebook posted that EXACT article and I nearly went ape shit. I thought twice since Facebook fights end up with a massive split sides. But I drew up a long response:


First, you have pornography. Now there are, of course, private sex tapes that are “leaked” by people. My question to anyone who agrees: why do we not seek out these people? Whether it be man or woman, the idea is it is a violation. But nobody does a thing about it at all. Well, let’s step back. What about doxxing? The flagrant and open posting of someone’s address/email/telephone or other information. Is that considered assault? Absolutely not. Assault requires a lot more than taking or sharing information. While still wrong, putting it on the same level of assault is an insult to those who go through true harm. Which brings my second point.

Second, who gets off on saying naked pictures are assault? That is absolutely wrong and I’ll use a link to help prove my point:
http://www.plea.org/legal_resources/?a=127&searchTxt=&cat=8&pcat=

And

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/assault-battery-aggravated-assault-33775.html

The first describes what assault is while the second describes a scenario. The scenario is one where you’re afraid and justified, but there is no clear and present danger. Then there is a scenario where there is clear danger. Of course it is over simplified, but this does not constitute any of what the writer is saying. It is embarrassing, it is a breach of privacy, and the perpetrators should be caught, but this is NOT assault.

Least I have a use for it now! Anyway, idiots like this is why lawyers are absolutely necessary. You can’t argue that this is assault.

Sep 1

itsquitealrighttobewhite:

theracismrepellent:

itsquitealrighttobewhite:

We need to start having large families in order to fight the changing demographics!

Why they all look the same? Do the cousins be fucking each other? Inbred ass crackers

~Tae

Your comment shows a complete lack of understanding of genetic similarity.

My brothers and I all look similar. Seriously, that blog is absolutely dumb. Basic genetics is really simple to understand

Sep 1

conservativekiwi:

thesnowskinnedwoman:

conservativekiwi:

thivus:

please don’t call pedophilia a sexuality that is giving it way too much credit

Same with bestiality.

People are calling pedophilia a sexuality? Are you freaking joking?

Nope. There are people that believe it’s a real sexual orientation.

This is the funny thing: I talked about this happening gradually. Perhaps it I only tumblr for now….but others are trying to make it a sexuality. A corrupt nation will allow all corruption

Sep 1

thivus:

pedophilia is a mental illness and social cancer not a sexuality

Sep 1

http://whittneydoll.tumblr.com/post/96386486497/craiganthonywells-naughtyconservative

craiganthonywells:

naughtyconservative:

craiganthonywells:

naughtyconservative:

Part of the reason I love the holidays is because of the fights between atheists/PC people vs. normal people regarding Christmas.

"Atheists vs normal people"

?

Crazy PC atheists who have…

It’s been enough that businesses and restaurants talk to their employees about not saying Christmas or anything.

Sep 1

ro-s-a-spark-s:

You know what?

I’ll take it one step further.

I don’t care about men, their feelings, or any of their thoughts, feminist or whatever.

And oh shut up. I am dating one and adore him. And he is fully aware I hate men and he 100% ok with it.

Because men are the actual worst.

*ahem*

Dear whomever you are,

Festering in a pool of hate is not good for your health. What’s worse is hating an entire sex. Why? I am glad you asked.

Since you hate an entire sex, I expect a few things. First, never have sex with a man. Ever. Why? Because you, in some logical loop, are submitting to a man and wanting him to please you. In other words, you rely on the man for some need. I suggest you become lesbian for all your pleasures.

Second, never ask a man for anything. Need something on a top shelf? Ask a woman. Otherwise your hatred is looked upon as irrelevant in the face of daily needs. If you can’t get along without a man, then do you really hate them? I mean truly hate them?

Third drop your man. While he may think your hatred of men is okay, the problem is he probably has figured out “she’s dating me so she can’t hate them that much”. If you truly hated them, wouldn’t you have a hard time being around them for any amount of time?

No, my dear, you do not hate men. Instead you feel a need to publish some misbegotten idea of misandry in order to feel better about yourself. True hatred would manifest much better than what you say. I’d say you don’t like men much, but just enough to have a man in your life.

Now excuse me, I have to go do manly things. I’ll send an “2edgy4u” shirt if you wish to feel more “hatred” or show it more often.

Sincerely
A Man